All of the gameplay elements feel plucked from other games, and carefully put together. There are no really defining characters, or moments. However, I can’t shake the feeling that there’s nothing that stands out. Screenshot: Back 4 Bloodīack 4 Blood has an incredibly generic feeling, which is ironic, since the developer essentially originated this type of game. Back 4 Blood has some great ideas, but I don’t know if it’s going to enter into my group’s rotation of games for a few reasons.
#BACK 4 BLOOD GAME HOW TO#
You would think that the originator of the franchise would know how to make a great co-op zombie shooter-but that’s not entirely the case. But it doesn’t matter what you call them, as long as it’s fun to kill them. But it takes a new look at the four player co-op formula, and changes some aspects significantly.īack 4 Blood is a four player co-op game in which you and a team of three others take on the role of Cleaners in a struggle against zombies, known as the “Ridden.” It feels like zombie stories are running out of names to call their particular brand of undead, and “Ridden” may be one of the worst I’ve seen. Back 4 Blood, when announced, seemed like a step back from that, however.
Our group absolutely loved the asymmetrical multiplayer in Turtle Rock Studios’ Evolve, and we still mourn the end of that game’s support.
I’m still knee deep in that style of game, and play Deep Rock Galactic and Vermintide 2 with friends a few times a week. Originally developed by Turtle Rock Studios under the banner of Valve (they were known as “Valve South” at the time), the four player co-op formula went on to dominate my playtime with video games. I spent a lot of time playing Left 4 Dead, which is the game that invented the formula. I love co-op games, especially of the four player variety.
0 kommentar(er)
